Product Review: Swarovski Habicht 8 x 30 W.


The Swarovski Habicht 8 x 30 W package.


A Work Commenced February 20 2024

Product: Swarovski Habicht 8 x 30 W

Country of Manufacture: Austria

Exit Pupil: 3.75mm

Eye Relief: 12mm

Field of View: 136m@1000m(7.8 angular degress)

Dioptric Compensation: +\_ 5

Close Focus: 3m advertised, 2.68m measured

IPD Range: 56-72mm

ED Glass: No

Light Transmission: 96%

Waterproof: Yes(4m/13 feet)

Fogproof: Yes

Operating Temperature Range: -25C to +55C

Weight: 540g advertised, 536g measured

Accessories: Cordura carry case, neck strap, rain guard, lens cloth, instruction manual.

Warranty: 10 Years(+1 year if product registered online)

Price(UK): £875.00

The Swarovski Habicht 8 x 30 W exudes quality from top to bottom.

Anyone with an interest in binoculars and their history will undoubtedly be familiar with the Swarovski Habicht Porro prism binoculars, the company’s oldest continuously developed product line, which began production immediately after WWII.  This review will concentrate on arguably the most popular of the Habicht line: the compact and lightweight 8 x 30 W.

First Impressions:

Belly Up.

The instrument was bought from a reputable dealer: The Birder’s Store in Worcester. The instrument was dispatched via expedited delivery and arrived within 24 hours of purchasing. The package was delightful: a nice presentation box with a beautiful alpine scene. The instrument was found encased in a lovely green Cordura case together with its rain guard. The package also contained a logoed neck strap, instruction manual and microfibre lens cleaning cloth.

The serial number reveals the year and month of manufacture: December 2022.

The instrument was immaculately presented with a serial number beginning with the numerals 12 indicating that its year of manufacture was 2022. The rubber eyecups are very comfortable but afford minimal eye relief at 12mm. This didn’t present a problem for me as I don’t wear spectacles while glassing. However, some folk have endeavoured to acquire the longer rubber eyecups that accompany the more heavily armoured GA model for better eye relief. 

The focus wheel moves smoothly and very precisely. Just over one revolution clockwise takes you from closest focus to a little bit beyond infinity. Unlike quite a few other reports, I do not consider the focuser on the 8 x 30 W to be overly stiff. Indeed, I very much liked it right out of the case! What I especially appreciated though was the + and – markings on the side of the focus wheel facing the ocular lenses: which allow the user to dial in the approximate focus for objects close at hand and in the middle distance without ever having to look through the instrument! 
I was very relieved to see the dioptre compensation ring moves with a fair amount of tension. This means little to no wandering while operating in the field. Indeed it is just about as good as that found on the Nikon EII 8 x 30.

I was particularly relieved to discover that the dioptre compensation ring under the right ocular is nicely frictioned to prevent wandering in field use.

The leatherette armouring on the 8 x 30 W seems more organic to me, less artificial, than that found on the Nikon EII body. It is slightly more elastic and grippy too. It didn’t take me long to find the best way to handle the instrument, which is a joy to hold in one’s hands. Being intimately acquainted with the haptics of the EII 8 x 30, I would say the only significant difference between the two models is the slightly wider spacing between the barrels and the central shaft of the Habicht, making it easier to wrap one’s fingers round. The latter is also a bit more streamlined than the former: a fact confirmed by comparing their weights – 565g for the EII and 536g for the Habicht 8 x 30 W.

The ocular lenses are a little smaller than those found on the Nikon EII and thus are ever so slightly harder to engage with.

Eyepieces: six elements apiece.

The 30mm objective lenses have immaculately applied coatings and are recessed a few millimetres from the binocular frame.

The Habicht 8 x 30 W objectives have very derp coloured multicoatings.



The leather neck strap is a real work of art it must be said, and an absolute pleasure to use. Beautifully crafted from traditional materials it’s adorned with the fetching silvered avian Swarovski logo on either side. Indeed I have yet to see a better neck-strap than this one!

The beautifully fashioned padded leather neck starp accompanying the Habicht is a worthy accessory for a product of this pedigree.

Although I elected not to store the instrument in the supplied green Cordura case for everyday use, it will serve as an excellent travel case when I need it.

All in all, the Habicht 8 x 30 W is a most charming and impressively designed instrument with a great deal of attention to detail immediately in evidence!  

Optical Testing:

My first optical tests were to check the collimation and look for internal reflections. Collimation was spot on as my star testing revealed. Directing an intensely bright beam of light from across my living room into the binocular revealed excellent results: just two very insignificant reflections noted with no diffused light or diffraction spikes( the standard result for a Porro). This was a most excellent result indeed!

This was confirmed by glassing a bright, waxing gibbous Moon in the February sky and a bright yellow sodium street lamp after dark, both of which showed the same great results.

Next I took some shots of the exit pupils, which you can see below:

Left pupil.


Right pupil.

As you can see, both pupils are perfectly round with very little in the way of any false pupils in their vicinity. You can however make out some light leaks well beyond the exit pupils which may be responsible for manifesting some glare and off axis flaring. More on this later.

The view through the Swarovski Habicht is simply out of this world! In careful tests involving my EII 8 x 30, Zeiss Victory Pocket 8 x 25 and a Leica Ultravid HD Plus(UVHDP)8 x 32, it was the clear winner in terms of sheer central sharpness, brightness and contrast. Really quite incredible!

Particularly memorable was a shootout I conducted with a new villager, Davey, who had just completed building a new home overlooking Loch Carron, just a few miles from my home. He recently acquired both an 8 x and 10 x 32 Leica UVHDP, as well as an older Leica Trinovid BN 8 x 32, and invited me up to his place to have a look around. Observing the loch and the surrounding forests from his porch, he got a good chance to compare the views in both the Habicht and his 8 x 32 with their similar sized fields. We both declared the Habicht to have the superior optics but his jaw dropped when I told him that the Habicht was half the price of the Leica!

It makes for wonderful viewing in any kind of lighting conditions, but really excels in dull, overcast lighting where its extraordinary light transmission(an astonishing 96%) pulls it readily ahead of all the competition. Comparing it most carefully to the EII 8 x 30 I would describe the Habicht as peeling off that last layer to reveal its subjects in breathtaking clarity. The field stop in the Habicht is very nicely defined also.

I do want to mention another brief test though. My former student and astrophysics graduate, Joe Stearn, joined me one afternoon with his dad’s Oberwerk SE 8 x 32. Joe reckoned his dad’s instrument was sightly better than his own unit which he left back home in rural Massachusetts. We compared the views and decided they were very close; with the nod going to the Habicht in ferreting out low contrast detail in dull overcast. Like I said before, the Oberwerk SE 8 x 32 with its ED objectives is an exceptional performer but at 800g it’s not a glass you want to carry round your neck all day!

Chromatic aberration is  better controlled in the Habicht compared with the EII, particularly off axis, but this might be due to the former’s smaller field of view(7.8 compared with 8.9 degrees in the EII).  Pincushion distortion is also vanishingly low in the Habicht, even at the extreme edges of the field, rendering it a most excellent instrument for studying architectural features. The sweet spot on this unit is quite generous: maybe covering the central 60 per cent of the field, after which gentle field curvature gradually distorts the outer part of the field of view. The Habicht has a very uniformly illuminated field though. Moving the gibbous Moon from the centre of the field to the edge revealed little in the way of light drop off. Some lateral colour and a touch of astigmatism were also in evidence by studying the bright star Procyon as it was gradually moved from the centre to the field stops.   
Notes from the Field:

Roof prism binocular killer.

Several Habicht 8 x 30 W users have reported that the instrument suffers from excessive glare. I can report that this is grossly exaggerated. Yes, it behaves less well against the light than the Nikon EII or Zeiss Victory but I have never perceived it as excessive with the worst cases easily improved by shielding with an outstretched hand over the objectives. The Habicht does exhibit strong off axis flaring however. Just placing a bright Moon just outside the field of view reveals this fairly easily. 

Close focus was measured to be 2.68m: better than the advertised 3m but this can actually be improved owing to the large beyond infinity reach of the existing focus wheel. By resetting the position of infinity closer to the end of its travel, a significantly better near focus value could be obtained. I am aware of a binocular repair company that can provide such a service. For others, the extra focus travel beyond infinity will help severely myopic individuals achieve good infinity focus without wearing glasses.

I have not had any issues with the focus wheel on the Habicht. Reports that it can’t be used for extensive birding activities because of the sluggish movement of focus wheel are also untrue in my experience. I’ve been able to track birds flitting from nearby bushes to trees in the middle distance with no problems at all. In short, it’s called skill and practice makes perfect!

Depth of focus and the wonderful stereoptic view only provided by Porro prism instruments are very similar in both the EII and the Habicht. Indeed they render roof prism models decidedly ‘flat’ in comparison.

Storage:

Easy access.

I elected to store the Habicht 8 x 30 W in a dry box: just like all my other non/waterproof Porros. It’s much easier to access the instrument using this set up compared with storing it in the zipped Cordura case supplied with the instrument.

Closing Remarks & Conclusions:

primus inter pares

The Swarovski Habicht 8 x 30 W exhibits the best optical performance I have personally experienced in the 30mm/ 32mm binocular format, with ergonomics that don’t fall far behind it. If anything it underscores my conviction that compact alpha roof models are a profligate waste of money.  If you’re after world class optics in a small, lightweight and weather resistant chassis, check this binocular out! It will delight its owners with years of peerless optical and mechanical performance.

Very highly favoured!


Neil English’s new book, Choosing and Using Binoculars: A Guide for Stargazers, Birders and Outdoor Enthusiasts, is now available for purchase.

De Fideli.

Product Review: Celestron Granite 7 x 33.

The Celestron Granite 7 x 33.


A Work Commenced January 27 2024

Product: Celestron Granite 7 x 33

Country of Origin: China

Chassis: Rubber armoured magnesium alloy

Exit Pupil: 4.71mm

Eye Relief: 15mm

Field of View: 159m@1000m( 9.1 angular degrees)

Close Focus: 2m advertised, 1.64m measured

Coatings: Fully Multicoated, phase corrected Schmidt Pechan roof prisms

ED Glass: Yes

Waterproof: Yes

Nitrogen Purged: Yes

Weight: 601g

Status: Discontinued

Over the years I’ve reviewed a number of Celestron binoculars and have been impressed by their efforts to bring higher than average quality optics and ergonomics to the market at prices that are affordable to many, such as the Trailseeker line and the more advanced Regal ED, for example, being the most recent examples to come to market. However Celestron actually began their foray into advanced roof prism binoculars about 12 years ago, when they launched their sophisticated Granite series, featuring an open bridge design, ED glass, fully multicoated and phase corrected optics. Initially, the series included 8 and 10 x 42 and larger, 10 and 12 x 50 models. But the general success of these instruments led to the marketing of a further two smaller models:7 and 9 x 33 Granites.

In my new book, I showcased a mini review of the 7 x 33 contributed by Philip Grimsey, a keen birder and amateur astronomer, based in Hitchin, England. My first encounter with Phil came through a purchase of a classic Russian 7 x 35 binocular, which turned out to be a very pleasant surprise and since then I’ve discovered that Phil is a kindred spirit, having a very similar taste in optics to yours truly. 

Phil contacted me asking if I’d like to test drive the 7 x 33 Granite for myself. Curiosity got the better of me and I accepted his kind offer. 

Ergonomics

My first impressions of the instrument were very favourable indeed. The magnesium alloy chassis is overlaid by a thick layer of matte black rubber, which affords excellent protection from the elements as well as accidental knocks and bumps. In addition, the underside of the instrument has shallow grooves for resting your thumbs in while glassing. The Granite was one of the earliest econo models featuring an open bridge design for superior handling. 

Belly side up.

Tipping the scales at just over 600g, the Granite is nifty, light-weight binocular that can be taken pretty much anywhere. 

The nicely machined metal eyecups are overlaid with soft black rubber.  They are very firm, with one intermediate position between fully retracted and fully extended, locking rigidly in place in all configurations. I think they’re excellent: a little smaller than the larger frame of Celestron’s more recent models, but right up there with those I’ve seen on models costing much more. Eye relief is very generous too: I was easily able to engage with the entire field wearing my eyeglasses.

The Celestron Granite 7 x 33 possesses excellent twist -up eyecups and a smoothly operating central focus wheel.

The large, centrally placed metal focus wheel is overlaid with raised strips of rubber which greatly assist with its turning. I would describe this focuser as being on the fast side, taking a little over one revolution to go from closest focus to a little beyond infinity. 

The dioptre compensation wheel is quite sensibly placed under the right ocular. It’s good and tight and held its position very well.


The Celestron Granite 7 x 33 has very nicely applied antireflection coatings which present a fetching bluish bloom as seen in broad daylight. Clearly they’ve held up very well over the years since its manufacture.

The Granite’s antireflection coatings are very evenly applied.

In the hands the little Granite 7 x 33 feels great, with plenty of room to position one’s hands to get an optimal grip. I had one minor niggle with the central hinge though. I felt it was a little loose for my tastes but in practice it never presented a problem. 

I did like the ocular covers though, which are tethered via a bracket on the underside of the barrels. They snap into place to seal off the objective lenses from dust and moisture. 

Optics

I checked to see how the Celestron Granite handled an intensely bright beam of light. It did very well indeed. Internal reflections were very well subdued and while I did detect a small diffraction spike around the light source but it amounted to little or nothing when I turned it on a bright sodium street lamp after dark and also on a bright gibbous Moon.

Examining the exit pupils also showed good results with only a fairly inconspicuous light leak around the main pupil(see below):

Left exit pupil.

The view through the Granite is very good: it has excellent central sharpness with some peripheral softening as the field stops are approached.  The large smooth focuser makes dialling in the precise focal plane easy. There is also a modest amount of pincushion distortion in the outer field. And boy what an expansive field it possesses at 9.1 angular degrees! I would describe the colour tone of this instrument as distinctly warm. Colour correction is excellent: there’s effectively none within the sweet spot and I could only detect a trace in the outer portion of the field while glassing through denuded winter tree branches against a bright overcast sky. 

As you’d expect from a 7 x wide angle glass like this, depth of field is very generous, being noticeably deeper than 8x or 10 x instruments, thereby requiring less frequent focusing.  Close focus distance was measured to be just 1.64 metres: an excellent result and well below the advertised 2m. 

Having readily enjoyed a 7 x 35 Porro prism binocular for quite some time, I’ve come to appreciate the sheer comfort of a larger exit pupil with an expansive field of view. The Granite served up a field quite reminiscent of the Porro but with a flatter, less 3-dimensional view.

I was able to ascertain more about the aberrations in the outer field by testing the unit under the stars. Stars remained tiny pinpoints of light within the sweet spot, which extends to about 60 per cent out from the centre, after which the same stars began to slowly morph and bloat as the field edges are approached. A lot of this could be focused out, indicating that field curvature was the main contributor, but some coma and astigmatism was also clearly present right at the field stops. Examining a bright gibbous Moon as it was panned from the centre to the field edges showed much the same thing. 

Glare suppression is very good in the Celestron Granite 7 x 33 too, performing well against the light but also handling veiling glare very effectively.

In Praise of the 7 x 33/35mm Format

In chapter 30 of my new book, I discussed some very charming 7 x 35 instruments from yesteryear, including a number of classic Porro prism binoculars such as the Nikon Action Mark I with its excellently corrected 9.3 degree field, the Swift Holiday Mark II with its 11 degree field, and the Sans & Streiffe sporting a  whopping 13 degree portal on the world. But companies like Leica (formerly Leitz)also marketed iconic roof prism models such as the Trinovid 7 x 35B manufactured from the 1960s through the 1980s and recently revamped in the ornate 7×35 ‘Retrovid’ with its upgraded coatings.

The ornate Leica Retrovid 7 x 35. Image credit Holger Merlitz.

The Celestron Granite 7 x 33 was the first Chinese manufactured instrument to break the European and Japanese monopoly on these instruments and did a rather excellent job to boot. Sadly the Granite 7x 33 was rather quickly abandoned for reasons unknown to this author but I hope this article will encourage other manufacturers to take up the gauntlet to produce a new 7 x 35 at prices that won’t break the bank. The advantages of such an instrument include:

Small. lightweight and portable

A wide and stable viewing experience

Improved depth of field over higher power models

A large exit pupil for improved performance in low light.

Such instruments are likely to prove very popular with birders, and outdoor enthusiasts and even for doing some casual astronomical viewing. It would be remiss of me not to also mention the Hawke Endurance ED Marine 7 x 32 with its 8.3 degree field, although this particular model was created for marine use. Will we see a model like the 7 x 33 Celestron Granite making its reappearance in the market? Time will only tell!

My thanks to Philip Grimsey for lending me the Celestron Granite 7 x 33.

Thanks for reading

You can read a great deal more about hundreds of other contemporary and classic models in my new book, Choosing & Using Binoculars: a Guide for Stargazers, Birders and Outdoor Enthusiasts.

De Fideli.

My New Binocular Book is Out!

ISBN: 978-3031447099

523 Pages

Foreword by Holger Merlitz, author of The Binocular Handbook

Price: £20.84(UK)/$32.99(US)

Available Now

Dear Reader,

My new book on binoculars is ready for purchase from Amazon and all good booksellers. Below is a list of the chapters presented in the book.

I hope that you will support me in my work.

Sincerely,

Neil English

Product Review: Zeiss Victory Pocket 8 x 25.

The Zeiss Victory Pocket 8 x 25 package.

A Work Commenced December 27 2023

Preamble

Product: Zeiss Victory Pocket 8 x 25

Country of Manufacture: Japan

Exit Pupil: 3.13m

Eye Relief: 16.5mm

Field of View: 130m@1000m (7.5 angular degrees)

Dioptre Compensation: +\- 3

Chassis: Magnesium alloy overlaid with black rubber

Coatings: Zeiss T* Multicoating, LotuTec coatings on objective lenses

Light Transmission: 91%

Close Focus: 1.9m advertised, 1.65m measured

Folding Mechanism: Single asymmetric hinge

ED Glass: Yes, Schott Fluorite containing objective

Waterproof: Yes (1m)

Fogproof: Yes

Accessories: Cordura clamshell case, neck strap, lens cleaning cloth, instruction sheet, warranty information

Dimensions: 11 x 11 cm

Weight: 290g advertised, 289g measured

Warranty: 10 Year (European)

Price(UK): £649.00

Although I fully acknowledge the superiority of larger compact and mid-sized binoculars, pocket instruments have always remained a charming proposition to me, especially when ultra portability is the desired endgame. That’s why my new book, Choosing and Using Binoculars, has a large chapter dedicated to such instruments.

In this review I’ll be setting down my thoughts on arguably the most sophisticated small binocular ever made: the Zeiss Victory Pocket 8 x 25, which caused quite a stir when it was first brought to market in 2017. Zeiss, of course, has a long history of creating sophisticated pocket binoculars. For example, I’ve already extensively showcased the less expensive Terra ED 8 x 25 in previous blogs, where I’ve extolled its many virtues. 

The original Victory Pocket had an 8 x 20 format, just like Leica’s Trinovid BCA and Ultravid BR models. It too had an asymmetric single-hinge design, folding down neatly so that it could fit inside a typical pocket, but Zeiss decided to completely redesign their flagship pocket glass, packing it full of features only found on their larger Victory models. Gone are the small 20mm objectives which were replaced by larger 25mm lenses, with magnifications of 8 x or 10x. I decided to test the more popular 8 x 25 model in this review with a view to answering an intriguing question raised  in the fascinating Birdforum thread highlighted in the preamble above: can the performance of this little 8 x 25 come close enough to a top-rated 30 or 32mm model to justify abandoning the larger format altogether?

First Impressions

The Victory Pocket 8 x 25 folded up.

Considering the fact that Zeiss has bestowed their Victory label on this instrument, I was expecting an attractive presentation box. I wasn’t disappointed. The rigid, white cardboard box opens up to show a picture of a bear family in the wilderness. The instrument is laid in a foam cutout adjacent to the grey Cordura clamshell case, which also contained the supplied neck strap. The only two other accessories:- an instruction sheet and Zeiss microfibre lens cloth are tucked away at the sides. Given the considerable expense of this instrument I was surprised to see no ocular or objective covers for the instrument included in the package. More on this later.

Ergonomics

As mentioned earlier, the instrument has a single, folding hinge offset to the left. Having only used more conventional, dual-hinge models, I found I had to totally re-think how I was going to handle this binocular but I’m delighted to say that after a little practice, I took to it like a proverbial duck to water. I found the most stable arrangement was to wrap my right hand round the right barrel, resting some of my fingers on the bridge and using the left index finger to rotate the focus wheel. This neatly avoids any contact with the dioptre compensation wheel mounted at the opposite end of the bridge. With a little bit of practice, I found this to be a considerably more comfortable arrangement than any dual- hinge glass I’ve experienced before.

The focus wheel is covered in textured rubber and is noticeably larger than that found on most other pocket binoculars. The motion is silky smooth and very precise, – much smoother than the Leica Ultravid 8 x 20 for example- taking 1.75 revolutions clockwise to go from closet focus to a little bit beyond infinity. Having a larger focuser is a real blessing,  especially when wearing gloves.

The large, textured focus wheel makes using the binocular a joy.

The Magnesium alloy chassis is overlaid by thick black texturised rubber armouring helping to bulk out the instrument for better gripping. I did note that it attracts dust and other debris rather easily however.

The twist-up eyecups are well made and hold their position firmly.

The twist up eyecups lock firmly in place. Overlaid by black rubber, they are very comfortable to rest one’s eyes against even for prolonged viewing periods. Eye relief is generous, especially for an 8 x 25 format. However, I was just able to see the entire field of view when the cups were retracted, but I wouldn’t describe the experience as comfortable. Luckily I don’t wear eyeglasses so this wasn’t an issue for me. In retrospect, I felt the Leica Ultravid 8 x 20 BR was easier to use with spectacles on, even though it has less quoted eye relief.

The ocular lenses are 20mm in diameter, so fairly large for this format. 

The large(20mm) ocular lenses are very easy to engage with.

The objective lenses are decently recessed for a pocket binocular, providing a few millimetres of protection from stray light and the elements. I noted different antireflection coatings on the ocular and objective lenses(purple). 

The small 25mm objectives are decently recessed.

The supplied neck strap is a scaled down version of the bigger Victory SF models. And while many complained about how difficult it was to pass the loops through the tiny lugs, I didn’t find it overly fiddly to attach. Round the neck it sits very comfortably and is an ideal match for the weight of the instrument(289g). 

All in all, the ergonomic qualities of the Zeiss Victory Pocket( VP) are a good step up from the Terra ED pocket previously showcased. 

Storage

One of the other issues commonly raised in the preamble thread link was the security of the dioptre wheel. Many reported that it moved quite a lot. Others even reported that it came right off! One would hope someone from the Zeiss team was listening as these reports came out. That said, the wheel on this unit seems firm and has a decent amount of inertia against movements. When set in the zero position,  the wheel slots into a small groove. Moving it either clockwise or anticlockwise reveals no other grooves. For the first few days of my tests, I placed the folded up binocular in the supplied case, wrapping the neck strap around the barrels. But I quickly noticed significant departures of the dioptre wheel from my ideal setting just taking it out of its case. Clearly the wheel was either catching on the top of the case or the neck strap, or both. 

To store the Zeiss VP 8 x 25, first double fold the neck strap under the bridge as shown.

I soon hit on a solution however, by storing the binocular with the barrels fully extended and the neck strap doubly folded under the bridge. Stored this way I have not encountered any movements. Problem solved. 

Next place the fully extended binocular flat on the floor of the case.

I do like the case however, a miniature version of those supplied with the bigger Victory SF models. I think it’s a very good match for the instrument. 

Optics

My first tests involved seeing how well the Zeiss VP 8 x 25 handled a bright beam of light from across a room. I’m delighted to say that it passed this test easily. I saw no significant internal reflections, no diffraction spikes and no diffused light around the target. This was a significantly better result than the lower-cost Terra ED 8 x 25 units I tested, which did show a prominent diffraction spike when pointed towards strong light sources after dark.

The appearance of the exit pupils in the Zeiss VP was not quite as excellent as those I recorded with the Terra pocket however, as you can see below.

The Zeiss VP 8 x 25 left exit pupil.


The Chinese-made Zeiss Terra ED 8 x 25 in comparison.

While the Terra produced an excellent result with a dark, cavernous blackness around the bright pupil, the Zeiss VP showed more light leaks, with a slight false pupil near the main entrance pupil. More on this a little later.

The image served up by the Zeiss VP is truly excellent: tack sharp from edge to edge, bright and contrast rich. Colour correction is excellent. I see none within its very large sweet-spot and only a few splashes of colour fringing near the field stops.  

I also noted that unlike the vast majority of other instruments I’ve tested, this well corrected field is seen both vertically and horizontally.  

Pincushion distortion is very well controlled in this instrument too, only appearing very mildly at the extreme edges of the field. The Zeiss VP 8 x 25 performs well against the light with very good control of glare: something pocket instruments are not renowned for. All in all, I can easily see why this little Zeiss binocular is a true member of their prestigious Victory series. 

Notes from the Field
I found that the flexi plastic rain guard offered by Opticron to be a decent fit for the Zeiss VP. Objective covers are unnecessary in my opinion, as these lenses hang downwards while the instrument is being transported around your neck. In addition, the objectives are treated with Zeiss’ proprietary LotuTec coatings to repel water and dirt during field use.

The Opticron flexi rain guard can be used to protect the ocular lenses of the Zeiss VP.


Reading through the many threads on the Zeiss VP 8 x 25, including the preamble linked to above, I noted the number of people who claimed that this instrument had replaced their 8 x 32 Alpha glasses, citing the VP’s large field of view(~7.5 degrees), its generous eye relief, superb optics and much better handling than any other pocket sized instrument. One seasoned naturalist even claimed that the Zeiss VP 8 x 25 was a “revolutionary” instrument or even “one of the great binoculars of our times.”

At home in nature.

I can certainly understand and even agree with many of these sentiments, having tested it under a variety of different environmental conditions. It most definitely behaves much more like a 32mm glass than I had expected. 

Close focus was a little underwhelming however, as I fully expected a value near 1.5m based on so many other reports. My measurements revealed a 1.65m close focus value: very good in the scheme of modern roof prism binoculars, but not exceptional.

Focusing is buttery smooth and easy even in sub-zero temperatures.  On a family visit to Braemar in the Scottish Highlands over the Christmas holidays, I subjected the VP to temperatures as low as -6C and it performed flawlessly, with no stiffening up of the focus wheel. Indeed Zeiss claim that the instrument operates flawlessly in temperatures ranging from  -25C to +63C!

I did detect a slightly increased amount of glare glassing strongly backlit targets near or just after sunset. I attribute this to the minor false pupil engaging with my dilated pupils under these lower light conditions. 

During a very windy spell of weather in early December, I often found myself out in open fields, glassing with the Zeiss VP. I found it was sometimes very difficult to hold such a lightweight instrument steady as 50mph winds swept across my line of sight. It was at moments like these that I started pining for my more bulky 8 x 30, which handles these blustery conditions much more convincingly.

Can the Zeiss VP 8 x 25 Replace an Alpha Compact 8 x 32?

Comparing the venerable Nikon EII 8 x 30 (left)to the Zeiss VP 8 x 25(right).

Millimetre for millimetre, the Zeiss VP 8 x 25 is a little sharper than the Nikon EII 8 x 30, but at this level of quality there is never very much between them. Having said that, the Nikon is the easier glass to use, because it’s all about lots of little things adding up:

Better handling

Greater mass to dampen vibrations better

A larger exit pupil for easier eye positioning

A far more relaxed view

Better performance in low light conditions

A much wider and more immersive field of view

A much more enhanced stereoscopic image

Greater aperture allowing for more astronomical targets to be enjoyed

So while the Zeiss VP 8 x 25 brings you very close to a top performing 8 x 32 roof, at least by day, it just can’t compete with the sheer, unabashed insouciance of a top performing compact Porro like the venerable Nikon E II. 

Recommendations

Superb optical performance in a great ultraportable package.

The Zeiss VP 8 x 25 delivers superb optical performance in a highly ergonomic, low weight package, making it ideal for lots of activities including travel, watching sports events, studying flowers and insects at close range, birding, trips to the theatre and/or museum, hiking etc.

For many it can and has replaced larger formats but in my opinion it will never match those unique views served up by a top quality 8 x 30 Porro system such as the Nikon E II, Swarovski Habicht, or Nikon SE 8 x 32. However and, acknowledging those marker stones, if uncompromising daylight optical performance and ultra-portability are your main requirements, the Zeiss VP is an easy choice to make. It is, in my estimation, the best pocket binocular ever made!

Kudos Zeiss Sports Optics!

Read more about this binocular and many other models in my new book, Choosing & Using Binoculars: A Guide for Stargazers, Birders and Outdoor Enthusiasts, now available for purchase on Amazon and all good book stores


De Fideli.

Book Review: The Binocular Handbook: Function, Performance and Evaluation of Binoculars by Holger Merlitz.

A technical treatise on binocular optics.

Title: The Binocular Handbook: Function, Performance and Evaluation of Binoculars.

Foreword by Neil English, author of Choosing & Using Binoculars

Publisher: Springer Nature

Author: Holger Merlitz

ISBN: 978-3031444074

218 Pages

Price UK: £39.99(Hardback)

It was with a great sense of anticipation that I finally got my hard-back copy of Holger Merlitz’s new book, freshly and expertly translated into the English language. Anyone who has expressed even a cursory interest in binoculars will be familiar with Holger’s accumulated writings on his website(http://holgermerlitz.de), where he has built up a formidable portfolio of work covering all aspects of binocular optics, reviews and theoretical speculations. His new book, The Binocular Handbook: Function: Performance and Evaluation of Binoculars, represents the culmination of many years of work.

Holger presents a full treatise on binocular optics in this book, covering everything from the design and execution of theoretical optics and their applications to building binoculars, a detailed overview of how the eye-brain interfaces with the binocular before launching into some fascinating chapters covering the testing and evaluation of binoculars during field use. In total, 9 chapters arranged in 3 distinct parts, walk the reader through pretty much everything you need to know about the fascinating world of binocular optics.

Instead of exhaustively covering the material, I would like to highlight just a few interesting topics covered in the book. I was most impressed with Holger’s use of an aeroplane’s ride from the North Pole round the world as a way of explaining why phase coatings are needed in roof prism binoculars. I also enjoyed his inclusion of discussions on unusual, cemented prism formats, such as the Uppendahl and the Perger (page 51-54) arrangements, the latter of which doesn’t require a phase correction coating and is used in the design of the third-generation Leica Geovid. Holger believes there are no binoculars containing Uppendahl prisms, but I have heard it on good authority that the little Leica Ultravid 8x and 10 x 25 may still be using such prisms. 

I found section 4.8 to be particularly amusing when Merlitz discusses sealing and gas purging. The use of the noble gas, argon, in particular, has been touted as being superior to molecular nitrogen owing to its greater molar mass. But as Holger astutely points out on page 97, the very low ambient concentration of argon in air(less than 1 per cent) would create a powerful concentration gradient causing the argon to diffuse out faster than if it were filled with nitrogen under the same circumstances. But it’s worse than that: a binocular filled with argon will cause nitrogen to diffuse inward and increase the pressure enough to eventually damage the seals! It neatly explains why all the big European binocular manufacturers have stuck with nitrogen purging.

Chapter 5 is written by Gerhard Eller, a fellow binocular enthusiast and engineering veteran, who describes the construction of a fascinating 12 x 62mm binocular using twin Leica Apo objectives and Porro II prisms serving up an impressive field of view of 113m@1000m.

The book has full colour illustrations.

The discussion on depth perception in chapter 7 and 8 proved to be fascinating entries, especially since I’ve cultivated a particularly strong fondness for compact Porro prism binoculars over their roof prism counterparts. Merlitz discusses the Japanese made RISO-1 7 x 40 instrument which were employed by the US navy during the Korean War. Indeed, he further informs us that specialised stereoscopic binoculars used in precision range finding measurements had enormous separations in their objective lenses of the order of several metres! That said, while the enhanced stereoscopic effects of Porro prism binoculars are greatly appreciated by yours truly, Holger also discusses some disadvantages of this design, such as inferior close focus performance and an optical illusion called the ‘cardboard effect,’ which was previously unknown to me.

The human eye takes centre stage in the final few chapters. With its 3-megapixel colour camera(cones) and 120 megapixel light detectors(rods), it can respond to changing ambient light levels and even alter the spectral response of the human eye. I’ve always wondered why, for example, many older glasses I’ve viewed through have a yellow tint. In discussing the differences between regular BaK4 and BK7 glass versus their HT equivalents, for example, companies like Zeiss have been able to increase the transmittance at blue wavelengths which helps in low light observations when the human eye becomes more responsive to shorter wavelengths (so called scotopic vision).

Sections 8.2 through 8.4 discuss the interesting topic of binocular efficiency and dim target detection as well as the factors – magnification, aperture, exit pupil and eye pupil size – that determine the outcomes in broad daylight, twilight and under darkness. Magnification alone determines efficiency in daylight, but the situation becomes far more complicated during twilight and full darkness, enabling binocular enthusiasts to experimentally determine the relative importance of these factors in target resolution and detection. Indeed, I’m currently busy comparing and contrasting my two main binoculars – the 8 x 30 and 10 x 35 Nikon EII – with their similar light transmission and exit pupil size – under twilight and true darkness based on Holger’s analysis, to determine if these predictions are validated.

Section 8.7 offers an excellent overview of atmospheric scattering and I really like how the author brings some basic physics such as Rayleigh scattering into the mix. Later in chapter 9, he discusses colour bias in binocular images, explaining why many binoculars having a so-called warm tone exhibit better contrast by (Rayleigh)scattering shorter wavelengths of visible light. On the contrary, he also explains why instruments delivering a cool colour tone are often better for low light work, when the eye becomes increasingly sensitive to shorter wavebands.

These are but a few invaluable nuggets of information presented in this book. The reader will note that much of this surmising is not just based in optical theory but derives from the rich storehouse of practical experience with many fine binoculars he has amassed over the decades. In short, The Binocular Handbook will prove invaluable to keen binocular enthusiasts eager to determine the best instruments to use in their arsenal, with the author gently encouraging active experimentation under real life conditions. Like most good books, it raises more interesting questions than it answers, but rest assured, there is enough content in this timely volume that will keep you thinking and looking for years to come.

Highly recommended!

De Fideli.


Product Review: Zeiss Terra ED 8 x 42.

The Zeiss Terra ED 8x 42 Package.

A Work Commenced November 9 2023

Preamble

Product: Zeiss Terra ED 8 x 42

Country of Manufacture: China

Chassis material: Polyamide, reinforced fibreglass

Exit Pupil: 5.25mm

Field of View: 125m@1000m(7.13 angular degrees)

Eye Relief: 18mm

Light Transmission: 88%

Close Focus: 1.6m advertised, 1.8m measured.

Coatings: Zeiss multicoating, LotuTec hydrophobic coatings on outer lenses

ED Glass: Yes(Schott ED)

Waterproof: Yes

Nitrogen Purged: Yes

Weight: 725g advertised, 728g measured

Dimensions:14 x 12cm

Accessories: padded logoed neck strap, clamshell case with zip lock, microfibre cloth, instruction sheet, rain guard and objective covers

Warranty: 2 years

Price(UK): £449.00

It’s been almost a decade now since Zeiss introduced their line of entry-level binoculars encompassing the Terra ED series. A few years back, I did a thorough test drive of the small pocket model and was duly impressed with its optical and ergonomic quality, I even investigated whether the quality of the original Japanese-made models of the Zeiss Terra ED Pocket were the same as their newer Chinese manufactured counterparts, finding that there was no discernible differences in performance between them. In this review, I’ll be reporting on the full-size 8 x 42 Terra ED.

During my investigation of the pocket model, I was contacted by a Zeiss Rep, who helped clarify many details about the Terra pocket binoculars but also offered some general comments on the philosophy behind Zeiss breaking into the mid-tier binocular market. She told me that their goal in marketing the new Terra ED line was to achieve ‘’best in class performance.’ She also told me that in the early days they were having some problems getting their Chinese employees to apply the coatings on the lenses to the standards established by Zeiss but that was close to being resolved. Fast forward a few years and I now feel that I have a truly mature product with all the initial manufacturing bugs having been eliminated.

First Impressions

The Zeiss Terra ED 8 x 42 is a handsome & well-appointed binocular.

I ordered up the instrument from Amazon. The package arrived in fine condition. The box was brand-new with no signs of tampering. I chose the plain, black-coloured model. Inside I found a nice quality storage box with a pretty alpine picture inside the top cover to whet my appetite. The instrument was found inside a well-made Cordura case – a scaled up version of that accompanying the pocket models. This is a far cry from the soft pouch that accompanied earlier incarnations of the same instrument.

The full-size 8 x 42 Terra binocular comes with a nicely fitting Cordura clamshell case.

The box also contained an instruction sheet with warranty information, a high-quality Zeiss microfibre cloth, and a good, wide, Zeiss-logoed neoprene strap. The instrument was located inside the case with the rubber rain guard and objectives covers attached.

Bellyside up.

I was pleasantly surprised when I took the binocular out for initial inspection. Zeiss apparently gave the larger Terra models a makeover in 2017, using a thicker rubber substrate to armour the re-enforced fibreglass chassis. It’s much more grippy than that found on the pocket models, smooth on top and nicely textured on the sides of the barrels. Unlike a number of other reports I’ve read, there was no strong smell from the rubber either. The Zeiss blue logo sits pretty on the broad single bridge.

Tipping the scales at just over 700g, the instrument possesses a median weight among 8 x 42 roof models I’ve tested. The large central focus wheel is superbly tuned. It rotates extremely smoothly with no play in either direction. Just shy of one full revolution clockwise brings you from closest focus(1.8m measured) to infinity and beyond. This is a very fast focussing mechanism – ideal for birding, as I was to discover.

The right eye dioptre is sensibly located under the right ocular lens and is fairly stiff to turn – a good thing surely. I’m glad Zeiss didn’t go for one of those gimmicky plastic locking dioptres found on similarly priced $500 binoculars, which are likely to malfunction sooner rather than later. Indeed, I personally don’t consider locking dioptres to be that desirable.

The twist-up eye cups are comfortable and very well designed.

The eyecups are excellently designed. Covered in soft rubber, they are extremely comfortable to rest your eyes against.  Four locking positions are offered, quite enough for most users. Unlike the 10 x 42 model, the eye relief is plenteous enough to image the entire field easily with ordinary glasses.

The objective lenses are nicely recessed. They have immaculately applied antireflection coatings that make the lenses almost disappear when viewed head-on. The large ocular lenses make centring one’s eyes easy and intuitive too. Zeiss had the presence of mind to include their proprietary LotuTec hydrophobic coatings to the outer lenses to cause water to bead and run off the lenses during downpours. You needn’t worry about the lenses fogging up in cold weather either. The same coatings will disperse any condensation very rapidly as my own testing verified.

The nicely recessed lenses have a beautiful magenta bloom.

I like the quality of both the rain guard and objective covers. Made from high quality rubber they fit snugly onto the instrument and provide excellent protection from the elements. The neck strap is of high quality – a good step up from the cheap generic designs you get with other models in the same price class.

Check out those large ocular lenses.

In the hand, the instrument feels great. It’s grippy, robust and with a silky-smooth focus wheel, it’s very easy to engage with. Overall, the Zeiss is a very handsome binocular both to look at and to hold and seems to be robust enough to withstand anything nature is likely to throw at it. This is one place where I disagree with the reviewer in Preamble 2 above. Good job Zeiss!

Optics

Inspecting the interior of the binocular when trained on a bright torch light revealed excellent results. There were no internal reflections or diffused light around the light source, but I did detect a weak diffraction spike – a common artefact in roof prism binoculars in all price classes. This was much more subdued than in the 8x 25 pocket Terras I tested though. The spike is not intrusive on larger light sources but when I trained it on small light sources in the distance, I could see that little diffraction spike. Overall though these tests proved quite excellent and so will make a great instrument for studying cityscapes or surveillance at night.

Examining the exit pupils showed very good results too(see below). They are big, round and have very good darkening around the pupils indicating good blackening of the interior and effective baffling.

A very good result.

I was very pleasantly surprised when I looked through this binocular. The view is excellent; bright, very sharp, wonderful contrast but what impressed me above all was its exceptional glare control. Testing the instrument in all sorts of conditions from bright autumn sunshine, dull overcast, and wet drizzly conditions yielded uniformly excellent results. Many other binoculars in this $500 price class have ED glass, but this binocular taught me that not all ED glass is created equal. This Zeiss contains Schott ED glass and it really shows! Other instruments I’ve tested in this price class tend to show glare in low light conditions or when pointed toward a strongly backlit target, but this nifty little Terra stubbornly refused to show anything significant. This is one of the optical virtues that sends it right to the top of the pack in this price class in my opinion. This also explains the excellent contrast of the images garnered by this instrument. While I could detect a very slight yellow tinge against a whitewashed wall, it made the images warm, enhancing the beautiful colour of autumn leaves. Many lesser binoculars are ruined by glare and even though they serve up perfectly sharp images, their lesser contrast brings them down a notch or two in perceived sharpness.

How does your binocular handle strongly backlit scenes like this? The Zeiss Terra ED handles it superbly!

Colour correction is excellent in this unit also. I could see none on axis and only a trace near the field stops even after testing it in very severe lighting conditions. The sweet spot is generously large. To my eye about 80 per cent of the field is very sharp with the last 20 per cent or so showing some softness. Pincushion distortion is very low and only manifests itself in the outer 20 per cent of the field. These low distortion images will be useful for studying architectural features.

Collimation was judged to be spot on as evidenced by how the binocular behaved under the stars. I also confirmed that the sweet spot extends to about 80 per cent of the distance to the field stops, with some field curvature and astigmatism morphing the stars significantly in the outer 20 per cent of the field. I also witnessed moderate illumination drop off when the Moon was moved from the centre of the field to the edges.

In summary, I was frequently reminded why Zeiss put their prestigious name behind this binocular. It has very high image quality and way above average resistance to glare of all types. I’m certain that it will delight the vast majority of people who look through it and therefore I’m in full agreement with the opinions garnered in Preamble 1 above. A thoroughly delightful visual experience!

Notes from the Field

The Zeiss Terra works flawlessly in wet weather.

The Zeiss Terra ED binocular is designed to operate flawlessly over a temperature range of -15 to +60C. In one test I left the instrument exposed to sub zero night temperatures for two hours(-3C), together with my Nikon EII 10 x 35. I can report that the focus wheel moved very easily and smoothly after this two hour exposure. In contrast, the Nikon focus wheel was much more sluggish and hard to turn until the grease had softened after warming up for a few minutes of it being brought back indoors.

Some of the more animated reviews I’ve seen, seem to be confusing a thin focal plane with depth of focus. Indeed, they seem to think that different binoculars offering the same magnification can show significant variations in focus depth but this is simply not the case. The main factor that determines focus depth is magnification – the lower the better. The super fast focus means that the focal plane is much thinner than found in a slower focuser taking say two or more revolutions to get from one end of its focus travel to the other. He also mentions the flat field of the Terra but I’m sure that’s just par for the course for a roof prism binocular. In another video, he compared a 10 x 42 Terra to a 10 x 42 Conquest HD and noted the Terra’s better colour correction.

The all but absent glare in the Zeiss Terra ED 8 x 42 makes it a particularly excellent instrument to use in dull overcast or low light conditions where colours become especially vivid. Browns and reds really pop in this glass! It was head and shoulders above and beyond my control 8 x 42s in this capacity. Views of the Moon are great: tack sharp, no glare or internal reflections and very little secondary spectrum within its sweet spot. Only at the edges of the field, did the Terra show some lateral colour but all within very acceptable levels. Is there anything I didn’t like about it? Well, yes; a small matter really. When I turned the instrument on a bright star field after dark, I noted how the brighter stars showed tiny diffraction spikes compared with my Porro prism binoculars, which produced perfectly round stellar seeing disks in comparison.  However, since I generally don’t star gaze with 8 x 42 roofs, this wasn’t an issue for me. The field of view of 7.1 degrees is also a little restricting, especially if you’re accustomed to enjoying expansive 7.5 or 8 degree fields. That said, I never felt ‘ tunnelled in’ while using it.

If you’re used to a slower focuser, the super fact focus wheel on the Terra 8 x 42 might take a bit of getting used to. But once you spend a few days in the field with the instrument, it becomes very easy and intuitive to use. Just a quarter turn brings targets from just a few metres away to several tens of metres away into perfect focus. This makes it particularly suited to high-intensity birding, and in this capacity, I enjoyed many moments following migrating Fieldfares and Redwings flit from the ground to the safety of trees in large groups. Sharpness at distance is also very noteworthy in the Zeiss Terra 8 x 42. I was able to pick off a tiny Goldfinch flying at a distance of 80 yards or so against a grey, overcast sky.

Conclusions & Recommendations

A gift from Zeiss.


The Zeiss Terra ED 8 x 42 was a very pleasant surprise. It has an extremely well thought-through design and seems very robust and reliable. Optically, I rate it quite highly. The images it serves up are tack sharp with well above average colour correction, contrast and glare suppression. Has Zeiss succeeded in achieving ‘best in class’ status with the Terra line? From the tests I’ve carried out the answer appears to be a clear ‘yes.’ You’re not just getting a mid-tier binocular here, it’s a Zeiss binocular and you can tell that from the moment you bring it to your eyes.

Highly recommended!

My new book, Choosing & Using Binoculars: A Guide for Stargazers, Birders and Outdoor Enthusiasts hits the bookshelves in December and is also available for pre-order.

De Fideli.

Product Review: The SvBony SA204 10 x 50 Binocular.

The SvBony SA204 10 x 50 package.

A Work Commenced September 17 2023

Product: SvBony SA204 10 x 50

Country of Manufacture: China

Exit Pupil: 5mm

Field of View: 114m@1000m(6.5 angular degrees)

Eye Relief: 19mm

Closest Focus Distance: 6m advertised, 5m measured

Chassis Construction: Rubber-armoured aluminium

Prisms & Coatings: BaK4 prisms, fully multi-coated

ED Glass: No

Waterproof: Yes, IPX6 rating

Nitrogen Purged: Yes

Dioptric Compensation: +/-4

IPD Range: 53-74mm

Tripod Mountable: Yes

Dimensions: 17.5 x 19.8 x6.4cm

Weight: 925g advertised, 875g measured

Accessories: Padded neck strap, rubber rain guard and objective covers, instruction manual, soft padded case

Price: US $84.99

Ever since its founding in 2009, Svbony has been delighting the astronomy and sports optics community with an expanding range of high-quality products offered at very affordable prices. SVBONY is an acronym which stands for Saturn(S), Venus(V), Birding(B), Optics(O), Nature(N), Youth(Y). I was first introduced to the company a few short years ago when I stumbled on their excellent SV202 ED roof prism binoculars, which have since gone from strength to strength and are now being enjoyed by an army of nature enthusiasts the world over. Not long before this time, consumers were left with very little option to shell out significantly more money for products that often left a lot to be desired quality-wise. Be sure to check out the most recent reviews of these binoculars. Since discovering the SV202s, I have also enjoyed some of their excellent spotting scopes, and regularly use some of their high-quality zoom eyepieces, like the SV191, which I’ve begun to employ extensively this season to observe Jupiter.

The impressive SV 191 7.2-21.6mm zoom eyepiece.

As a dedicated fan of Porro prism binoculars, I’ve steadily come to realise their exceptional value for money owing to great advances in technology, as well as their much simpler design compared with high-performance roof prism binoculars. Truth be told, it takes a lot of knowledge and technology to create roof prism binoculars that can even begin to approach the quality of a traditional, well-made Porro prism design. What’s more, many of the conventional objections purists have laid against the humble Porro prism binocular have now been satisfactorily addressed, including advances in anti-refection coating technology, water- and fog-proofing, and the introduction of modern twist-up eyecups with much better eye relief to accommodate eye glass wearers. In addition, advances in material science also means that good Porro prism binoculars can now be manufactured with lower mass chassis, allowing them to be carried longer in the field.

It was these considerations, as well as my own experiences with several budget-priced Porro prism models that led me to appraise one of Svbony’s newest products, the SA204 10 x 50, a traditional Porro prism binocular. Having ordered several products directly from their online store, I decided to purchase this instrument directly from Svbony too, since they’re currently not available from Amazon UK.

First Impressions  

The Svbony SA204 10 x 50 binocular.

The SA204 10 x 50 package took about two weeks to arrive from the Far East to my home. As usual with Svbony, I was extremely impressed with the attention to detail in how it was packaged during its long trip to the UK. The instrument arrived double boxed inside some bubble wrap to ensure that nothing moved out of place during transit.  All the accessories were also neatly packed away, including the ocular and objective covers, a carrying strap, lens cleaning cloth, a well-written instruction manual and a decent soft padded carry case. Inspecting the binocular, my first impressions were very favourable. The instrument is covered in a high-quality textured rubber substrate, ribbed at the sides for extra grip. The twist-up eyecups moved smoothly and were easy to adjust, keeping their individual positions firmly when clicked into place. Two intermediate positions are available between fully retracted and fully extended, so plenty of options for those who like to experiment.

Belly side up.

The aluminium central hinge is nicely tensioned, allowing you to easily adjust it to your preferred IPD. Once there, it stays rigidly in place. The rubber-covered central focus wheel has deep ridges to afford extra grip. Turning is very smooth with no free play. It ‘s quite stiff though, a consequence I suppose of the instrument being properly sealed and nitrogen purged. The focuser moves the eyepiece assembly up and down with no annoying wobbles I’ve seen in other instruments in this price class. 0.8 turns anticlockwise takes you from closest focus to jut beyond infinity. Eye relief is very generous. I was easily able to engage with the entire field using my varifocals, although I don’t wear spectacles when glassing under normal circumstances.

The dioptre adjustment is made using a small lever under the right eyepiece that rotates either clockwise or counter-clockwise, and I was easily able to find my optimal position. Once set in place, it stays there. I would say it’s very nicely engineered.

The large ocular lenses and twist-up eyepieces are easy to engage with.

The large ocular lenses have nice green multi-coatings and the objectives are decently recessed as all good binoculars ought to be. The objective coatings appear to be significantly more subdued to those applied to the ocular eyepieces and I detected a faint reflection off one of the interior lenses possibly indicative of one surface being singly coated. The rain guard and tethered ocular covers are quite basic but do an adequate job protecting the lenes from rain and dust.

The 50mm objectives have good coatings although there appears to be one surface that may be singly coated based on its appearance in daylight.

The instrument feels really nice in the hand with plenty of wiggle room to engage with my medium-sized mitts, making it easy to hold the instrument firmly. I was pleasantly surprised by the weight of the instrument without the strap and lens covers. Although the specs claim 925g, my SA204 tipped the scales at just 875g or 50 g less than advertised!  All in all, I came away with the impression that this was indeed a nicely appointed binocular, significantly better built than other 10 x 50 Porros I’ve tested in the past, including the Opticron Adventuer T WP and the Nikon Aculon.

Optics

My optical testing began by measuring the effective aperture of the instrument by directing my iPhone 11 torch into one of the eyepieces and measuring the size of the resulting circular shaft of light emerging on the other side of the objectives. By tracing a circle of diameter 50mm, I was able to show that the circular light shaft fitted snugly into the circle indicating that the SA204 was operating at its full aperture.

The SA204 10 x 50 operates at its full aperture.

In the next test, I examined how well the binocular handled a beam of bright light. Turning on a sodium street lamp after dark, I was relieved to see that only a few minor internal reflections were seen that were largely non-injurious to the image. There was no diffused light around the light ether. Consulting my notebooks, I reported a little more internal reflections for both the Nikon Aculon and Action EX Porros(both of which retailing for considerably more than the SA204) I reviewed some time back and about the same as I recorded with two models of Opticron Adventurer T, but not quite as good as that seen in the significantly more expensive Opticron Imagic TGA WP(a £200 value).

Looking at the exit pupils yielded quite good results. I recorded nice round circles but I could see some light leaks around the pupils suggesting that better blackening on the inside of the tubes wouldn’t have gone astray.

Left pupil.
Right pupil.

I had the opportunity to test the SA204 in all kinds of lighting conditions. The image is quite good: sharp, nice contrast, with a surprisingly large sweet spot. Colour fringing is very well controlled, especially off-axis.In this capacity, it’s certainly in a completely different league to the Nikon Aculons I tested, which displayed alarming levels of lateral colour to my eyes. Glare suppression is quite good too. I discovered that by retracting the eyecups one notch down from fully extended improved both the visibility of the field stops and the amount of glare I recorded. The instrument has an impressively wide field of view of 6.5 degrees with very well-defined field stops. I did perceive some peripheral softness near the field edges but it was not at all objectionable to my eyes. The instrument does display strong pincushion distortion however. I took the liberty of photographing some pink flowers at a distance of about 30 yards to give the reader an idea of how well corrected the field is:

Flowers imaged obliquely at 30 yards distance. Medium Resolution Image.

Close focus was measured at about 5m, less than the 6m advertised, putting it in the same ball park as a few other 10 x 50 Porro’s I’ve used. Of course, an instrument like this excels under the stars, where the 10x magnification and 50mm objectives pull in a lot of starlight. I checked collimation under the stars by defocusing the bright star Capella using the right eye dioptre while keeping the left barrel image as sharp as possible. The focused star remained well inside the defocused anulus not only in the centre of the field but also when placed to the extreme north, south, west and east edges, indicating very accurate alignment of the left and right barrels. Examining the Alpha Persei Cluster high up in the eastern sky reveals a rich cache of stars scattered across the field, I was delighted to see that they remained acceptably small and sharp across most of the field with only the outer 20 per cent of showing some mild distortion.  But even at the field stops bright stars like Vega and Altair remained quite tightly focused. Moving bright stars to the edge of the field showed little in the way of illumination drop off either. These results were most impressive for a large binocular retailing for significantly less than $100. Indeed, this instrument can be used to very good effect for general stargazing.

I estimated the field size by trying to image Alkaid and Mizar in the Plough, which have an angular separation of precisely 6 degrees 40’ or 6.66 angular degrees. I was unable to keep both stars in the same field of view but only just so, indicating that the advertised field size of 6.5 degrees was quite accurate. Views of the bright waning Moon rising over the eastern hills showed very nice results, with excellent crater detail coming through across the southern Highlands. There were a few minor internal reflections seen around the silvery orb, but they weren’t judged to be too offensive. I could detect a sliver of chromatic aberration at the edge of the Moon when centrally placed in the field  but this could be largely ameliorated by carefully reconfiguring eye placement. Off-axis colour fringing was more obvious though, but nothing I would describe as being out of the ordinary.

There was one negative however, and it manifested itself as I was imaging star fields in the vicinity of some streetlamps. Some of this peripheral light was entering the field, brightening the background sky by a tad. This disappeared however when I moved to the darkest location in my garden away from such light sources. In contrast, my Nikon E II 10 x 35(retailing at nearly ten times the price of the SA204) handled this stray light much more effectively. That said, I don’t count this as a major issue, and Svbony would do well to blacken the inside of the barrels that little bit more effectively.

Aperture Wins!

Comparing the Svbony Sa204 10 x 50(left) and Nikon E II 10 x 35(right) under the starry heaven.

Lest anyone be uncertain about the benefits of aperture, I took the opportunity to test both the SA204 10 x 50 and Nikon E II 10 x 35 under a dark country sky with no Moon during the wee small hours of September 17. Turning the instruments on the faint galaxy duo M81 & M82 in Ursa Major, I did manage to see them in both instruments, but they were much easier to see in the 10 x 50. The same was true when I moved the instrument to the celebrated Double Cluster in Perseus, now passing near the zenith at about 2.00 am local time. The view was compelling in both instruments, but the clusters were considerably richer in the larger glass. Ditto for the wondrous Pleiades and Hyades in Taurus as well as tracking down the trio of Messier open clusters in Auriga still low in the east. Indeed, I was quite impressed by just how well the SA204 managed to image the Hyades, with its constituent stars filling most of the field. I noted how well defined fiery red Aldebaran presented itself when positioned at the south-eastern edge of the field! All this to show that ‘you cannae change the laws o’ physics captain’ no matter how sexy and optically pristine the smaller, more expensive glass may be.

Conclusions and Recommendations

Great bang for buck!

The Svbony SA204 10 x 50 represents excellent bang for buck. It serves up a well corrected, sharp, bright and high contrast image with good control of chromatic aberration. It will serve as a fine general-purpose binocular, where it excels at low light observations and astronomy. I would have been thoroughly delighted with an instrument like this were I starting out in binocular astronomy again. I would however recommend using a more substantial neck strap than the generic one supplied with a chunky instrument like this. Better attention to internal blackening to improve contrast when observing under bright night lighting would also go a long way to making it an even better performer. That said, if you’re after a cost-effective instrument that does many things well, I would certainly recommend this neat 10 x 50 Porro to all and sundry.

Dr Neil English’s new 650+ page book, Choosing and Using Binoculars: A Guide for Stargazers, Birders and Outdoor Enthusiasts, caters for all budgets and will soon be published in paperback. Now available for pre-order.  

De Fideli.

An Open Letter to Oberwerk Regarding the SE 8 x 32 ED.

The venerable Oberwerk SE 8 x 32 ED.

Preamble

Regarding the Obserwerk SE 8 x 32 ED

SN: 232161

Sunday September 10 2023

Dear Mr. Busarow,

After reviewing and continuing to use the 8 x 32 SE for a further seven months, I am more impressed than ever with this instrument. I’m not at all surprised that it has garnered more than 10,000 views on Birdforum alone, and an even greater number of visits on my website.  As detailed in my original review, I showcased many terrific features of this instrument which I will summarise as follows:

  1. Exceptional blackening around the eyepieces with near perfect exit pupils
  2. Complete lack of any internal reflections or diffraction spikes when directed at a bright artificial light source
  3. Exceptional colour correction from the small 32mm objectives
  4. Exceptional glare suppression
  5. Sensibly perfect images within its very large sweet spot
  6. Excellent edge-of-field performance despite its lack of field flattening optics
  7. Superb handling in all weather conditions
  8. Exceptionally well protected objective lenses
A Reminder: left exit pupil of the Oberwerk SE 8 x 32 ED.

I’ve already commented that its sharpness and colour correction are superior to the highly rated Nikon E II 8 x 30, but its optical and ergonomic excellence has also been noted by a number of other experienced observers including the Irish birder, ‘Sancho,’ who compared it to his Zeiss TFL 8 x 32 and, based on subsequent field testing, now uses it as his ‘favourite all-round’ birding instrument.  I would like to remind you of his posts here:

My Oberwerk SE 8×32 arrived today. I haven’t had much chance to “test” it, and in any case a birding bino needs to be tested over a few weeks while actually birding. Also, I am non-technical, so anything I say is “amateur user” opinion only, applying only to my eyes. I agree wholeheartedly with everything Dipperdapper says in the excellent review. Total cost to my door (in Ireland) was 368 euro, inclusive of 68 euro customs charges, plus postage. Communication and tracking details from Kevin in Oberwerk was excellent. At first, I was dismayed when I lifted the box…it felt heavy. But when I removed the packaging, and held the binos in my hand, they didn’t actually feel that heavy because the ergos and balance are excellent. Not unlike my Nikon SE 10×42, but about 50g heavier. The Oberwerk certainly is a tough, tank-like bino, feels very solid and durable. I like the longer objective barrels because I can get two fingers around them, as with the SE 10×42, and I find this helps further with stability. The objectives are deeply recessed, another feature I like because I presume they are more protected from stray light or damage. The focus wheel is stiffer than I would like, but I reckon this is the price you pay for a waterproof porro, like the Habicht 8×30. Although it is a wide wheel (see OPs photos), I find it a little difficult to get my fingers to it, and prefer the position of the FW on the Nikon 10×42. (OTOH, the diopter adjuster is on the right ocular, where the Binocular God intended….easy to adjust, but also firm enough to stay put). In any case the focusser has no play and turns smoothly. Eyecups twist in and out and have four positions. The bino came with a strap for the case, plus two straps for the bino…a lighter “stretchy” neoprene one for comfort, or a tougher fabric-type one. Try as I might, I could induce no CA, even looking against bare tree branches against a bright, high-cloud Irish February sky. In this it was the equal of my Zeiss TFL 8×32, which is excellent. The FOV (8.2 degrees) is similar, and to be honest it was sharp across most of the field, to the extent that to find any softness at all, I almost have to stick my eyeball into the bino and search sideways! In other words, the field-flattener question is a non-issue. I tried to induce flare/glare, and couldn’t manage that either, even while looking as close to the lightly-clouded sun as was possible without endangering my eyesight. I have no idea how to “measure” light transmission, but it seems plenty bright, not quite as bright as my TFL 8×32 but that’s unsurprising. I’m going to stick my neck out a bit here and say that I think the sharpness/constrast/pop (I don’t know how to separate these “concepts”) might be a little ahead of the TFL. However, this may be just because of today’s conditions, or I may be suffering from “new-bino enthusiasm”….it needs a bit more study out in the field, in different lighting conditions. The warranty is two years, but it feels like a bino that will be used by my as yet non-existent grandchildren. An interesting feature is that in the plain black box (thank you Oberwerk, no expensive fancy boxes!), there is a card headed “Quality Checklist”, with Date, Sale, SN etc., and all the features ticked off (under the headings Appearance, Mechanical, Alignment/Collimation, Resolution) and initialled “KGB” (whom I presume is Kevin rather than the defunct Soviet body). I’ll take these out and about over the next few weeks, and play with them a bit more, but I think they are a pretty stunning binocular at any price, and for 368 euro delivered a no-brainer, unless you favour roofs and very light binos.

Source: Birdforum link post #17

Furthermore, Sancho followed up with this post some months later:

Hi just reporting back on the Oberwerk SE 8×32, after four months of use. You know how it is, you never “really” know until you’ve used binos in the field in various conditions. I have to say these have become my favourite “all-rounder, grab n’go” binoculars, and my closet contains original SEs and some big European badges. I thought early on there was a bit of “play” in the focus, but there isn’t, it just focusses at different speeds as you turn the dial (if that makes sense). It is the best bino I have at suppressing CA and stray light, and the image has the punch and contrast that reminds me of my old (sadly sold) Nikon EDG 8×42. I love the stereopsis (3D?) effect of porros, so that’s a plus for me. I’m sorry I don’t have the technical vocabulary for talking about optics; I just love these and am thinking of buying the Oberwerk SE 10×42 to complement them.

Source: Birdforum link post #117

Another experienced observer, ‘Paultricounty,’ also offered his opinion on the 8 x 32 SE:

“These are bright and sharp binoculars. I’m going to get in trouble here with some Nikon guys, but they are brighter and at least as sharp as the Nikon SE’s. They’re more neutral in color than the Nikons and has a much wider field of view. There is no field flattener like the Nikons , so they’re not sharp to the edge. It’s a very usable FOV with fall off starting at around 75% , but no mushy edges like the Kowa BDII 6.5 and 8x and some other MIC bins. Contrast is as good as the Nikon and I couldn’t see the slightest amount of CA, clearly superior to the Nikon in that area.”

Source: Birdforum link post #83

Swiss binocular enthusiast Pinac, had this to say about the same instrument on the Oberwerk website:

I ordered one online at Oberwerk in Dayton OH on a Thu midday, Oberwerk dispatched the same day, and I got the SE at my home in Switzerland after 3 business days – not bad (for Oberwerk customer service and UPS)! I had been forewarned by the various reviewers that the SE is quite big and heavy for a 8×32 – it is indeed, but build quality and finish are excellent, and ergonomics are superb, the bino fits snugly into my hands, a joy to use. The immediate impression is that for a 250 $ bino, the optics are really good.

My sample actually magnifies 8.2 x. The measured RFOV and AFOV values are a bit narrower than specified by Oberwerk, but still very nice.

Plenty of eye relief; spectacle wearers should be fine.

Nice extra travel of the focus wheel of ca. 5 dpt beyond the infinity position.

Given that the number of available good 8×30 / 8×32 porro binos is continually shrinking, this is a very welcome additon to the binoculars market, not only for porro enthusiasts.

Source: Oberwerk Website Review# 2

And yet another review from a gentleman named Noah Lawes, who compared it to his Leica BN 8 x 42:

I’m extremely impressed with the 8×32 SE. It provides a beautiful, sharp, sparkling view. It compares favorably with my Leica BN 8×42, and it’s even better in some ways, including CA control, ergonomics, and handheld stability (especially when using the “hat trick” resting the bill of a cap on the prism housings. I’m working on a longer review which I plan to post on one of the forums, but for now, suffice it to say that I think this is a great binocular in absolute terms, and it’s just amazing that you can get it for $250.

Source: Oberwerk Website Review#4

It was also very favourably reviewed by the experienced Italian binocular enthusiast, Piergiovanni Salimbeni, who stated that its performance was similar to roof prism models costing €1K. Be sure also to check out the extensive video footage he captured through the instrument on his accompanying YouTube presentation.

Having said all that, I must report one additional observation regarding the instrument’s field of view. It was after comparing it to the Oberwerk Sport ED 8 x 42 that I noted its smaller field of view in comparison. Indeed, I conducted a star drift measurement and found its field of view to be 7.48 angular degrees, which is actually the same as the Nikon SE 8 x 32. Curiously, this was also noted by CNer Rustler 46 in this link.

I fixed the problem I had with the wandering dioptre, simply by securing my preferred position with a drop of Loctite superglue – problem solved!

No more dioptre wandering!

Finally, I suggest a few improvements to the instrument:

  1. Reduce the overall weight of the chassis by housing the optics in a polycarbonate body. Better still, a magnesium alloy chassis would offer greater ruggedness and a reduced overall weight. These days, magnesium alloy is not confined to high-end models but is now being offered even on budget-priced instruments.
  2. The focus wheel could be tuned better. Some owners have complained that there is some slack in the focuser, while others have noted its overly stiff tension. Improving this important ergonomic feature will greatly improve its enjoyability.

Please don’t be discouraged concerning the undeserved attacks Oberwerk has endured regarding its Chinese manufacture. Is not China a sovereign nation, just like all the other nations under the sun? Does it not have people? I note that most of the negativity came from folk who never experienced the instrument first-hand. Indeed, I suspect from the sheer volume of views that many of these dissenters actually ended up secretly purchasing the instrument lol!

In summary, it’s no exaggeration that the Oberwerk SE 8 x 32 is destined to become one of the great 32mm binoculars of our time. It’s all the more remarkable that you were able to bring it to market at such an attractive price point, which resonates well with my key objective to provide the reader with genuine bargains in today’s market in order to grow this wonderful hobby worldwide.

I wish you continued success with this amazing product!

Sincerely,

Neil English PhD.

Author of the new book, Choosing & Using Binoculars: A Guide for Stargazers, Birders & Outdoor Enthusiasts, which will soon be published by Springer Nature.

De Fideli.

Book Review: Britain’s Birds: An Identification Guide to the Birds of Great Britain & Ireland.

A Work Commenced September 1 2023

Title Britain’s Birds: An Identification Guide to the Birds of Great Britain and Ireland

Authors: Rob Hume, Robert Still, Andy Swash, Hugh Harrop & David Tipling

Publisher: Princeton University Press

ISBN: 978-0-691-19979-5

pp 576

Price(UK): £20.00

Though I certainly wouldn’t call myself old, I’m certainly old school, preferring traditional ways of doing things compared with modern ‘gee whizz’ techniques. And when it comes to birding, I enjoy the challenge of first seeing and studying a new species, taking some notes, and then doing some bookwork to make a formal identification. Up to now, I’ve been using the RSPB Handbook of British Birds, which has served me quite well. It’s packed full of details about bird behaviour, habitats and basic biological information, but the illustrations, while being decent, have sometimes lacked enough detail for me to nail the identification of many smaller birds, such as warblers and finches. But that’s where this new work, Britain’s Birds: An Identification guide to the birds of Great Britain and Ireland hits the mark. This new work is lavishly illustrated with excellent full-colour photographs – a total of 3,591 in all – of the birds of the British Isles in their various stages of life, which makes identifying species much easier. The subjects are presented in their natural habitats which can prove very important to making those final decisions on the identity of a target.

Unlike the RPSB Handbook, the accompanying text is very concise and, for me, achieves an excellent balance between providing enough information to achieve an identification but leaving out unnecessary extraneous details that can all too often side-track the reader. The field experience of this multi-author text is abundantly in evidence, with astute insights conveyed to craft succinct ‘word pictures’ that clearly reveal expert identification knowledge. Each bird species is accompanied by a map of the British Isles showing where they are most likely to be found, together with arrows conveying migratory routes from Scandinavia, central Europe and Russia, as well as where summer migrants to the British Isles depart these islands in the autumn.

A typical page.

Although Britain’s Birds is touted as a field guide, its substantial weight – a whopping 1.4 kilograms – precludes its regular use as a true resource that can be used in the great outdoors. But it has a good quality sewn binding unlike the glued pages of the RSPB Handbook, which will increase its longevity going forward.

I found one entry that genuinely confused me. On page 474, the entry under ‘Nuthatches’ shows a map of the British Isles where you would come away with the impression that this species is not actively present in Scotland. This seems to be an anomaly. Nearly every passing day I’ve recorded two and sometimes many more of these birds in many different locations throughout Scotland. Nuthatches are alive and well in Caledonia!

Although published by Princeton University Press, 40 pence out of each purchase is donated to the RSPB. Undoubtedly, the RSPB, which is now approaching the 130th anniversary of its founding, has done a great deal of good in raising awareness about bird conservation and initiated many schemes across the country to conserve endangered species, there are worrying concerns that this charity has recently been infected by woke ideology, recently launching a scathing invective against the British government. I for one do not want any charity or public institution becoming politicised and promoting climate change alarmism and other ridiculous scaremongering claptrap. I don’t want to see the RSPB go down the dangerous road of virtue signalling- a path that has ruined numerous other charities. If you go woke, prepare to go broke!

That being said, Britain’s Bird’s is a tremendous work that deserves great success. Now in its second(2020) edition, it’s an indispensable guide that birders and naturalists will find invaluable. And at a retail price of £20, it’s an absolute steal!

Highly recommended!

De Fideli.